Back to Serious Fraud Office (SFO)
The British Governmental Serious Fraud Office (SFO) department was informed properly about #Bgate case. The recent events require updating their profile:
As we found out last weekends from our Barclays' insiders, Barclays' CEOs for years DECIEVE its staff, shareholders, partners, and even members of their families about Beloy's case. And we were SHOCKED with details.
Starting with, they argue existence of ANY(!) DEBT to its customer Sergiy Beloy! (In this connection we would recall that in 2015 it took almost 5 months for their customer service just to accept in written at least existence of official Beloy's savings accounts in the Barclays bank). Further CEOs' presentation of these events is based on their intentionally FALSE statement that in 2016 they have paid their debt to Mr Beloy already. We must refute that LIE:
First, that wasn't about reimbursing their debt to Sergiy! It was about their first (and as appeared later, the only) tiny symbolic payment towards their future Settlement. And it took for them the whole 16 YEARS. And Sergiy did NOT obtain that money at all!!!
Because the CEOs did it IMPOSSIBLE for him!
They sent to Sergiy their banking CHEQUE, which Sergiy could not cash!
Banks in his country stopped processing any checks a year before! And to cash it in Europe or anywhere in the world requires openning a local banking account, which is impossible for non-residents! And the Barclays CEOs KNEW that: Sergiy told that them for a half of year before, and a half of year after that sending! However, among all other legally existing ways of sending money proposed them by Sergiy (transfer to his bank in his native country, or through any other international money transfer services, e.g., WesternUnion), they intentionally (FRAUDELENTLY) chosen the only one that was IMPOSSIBLE for Sergiy!
But much bigger degree of that FRAUD appeared in their using the fact of recieving that cheque by Beloy as evidence of their official paying all Barclays' debts to him. And we have all reasons to believe that was a main and the only purpose of that transaction!
Since then, the Barclays' CEOs makes a FALSE impression that they (1) paid their debt, and (2) paid it in full. Neither of these statements is true.
The FACT is the Barclays' DEBT to Sergiy Beloy EXISTS!
During last 18 years, there is an official obligation of the Barclays Bank to its customer Sergiy Beloy, at least related to his original savings accounts in that bank.And in 2016 the Barclays' CEOs attempted to FALSIFY that fact. By the way, with the help of their FRAUDELENT official payment paper! While 100% true FACT is that since 2000, Sergiy Beloy has NOT recieved from the Barclays Bank a single penny!!!
ALL THEIR OTHER RELATED DEBTS TO Mr Beloy ARE SIMPLY IGNORED!
Another ambarrassing act of the CEOs is speaking about amount of money at Beloy's savings accounts in an arrogant manner, like, ...
the sum is too small.
First, such digits are quite relative. They may be not very impressive in the rich U.K., but in his native poor country he could live for it couple years. Anyway, the sum on Beloy's accounts in Barclays bank would be sufficient enough for paying ALL(!) HIS DEBTS the year when his apartment was set to be confiscated!
Second, a fact of existence of any debt, - as well as stealing!, - does not depend on a sum!
It either exists, or not!
And in our case the answer is positive!
Moreover, the key feature of the #Bgate is existence of INFINITE DEBT, the most important details about which we did not supplied to SFO!!! And fact of its INFINITY makes our already EXCEPTIONAL case ABSOLUTELY UNPRECEDENTED!!!
Why we did not touch this topic in our conversation with SFO? We had certain reasons to doubt SFO' objectivity at that time. And as following events showed, it was a right decision.
Our guess was:
Nobody would really investigate legality of Beloy's INFINITY Debt invention. Once completely full in its integrity information on INFINITE Debt appear at SFO's desk, it will be officially announced not legal, no matter what degree of uncertainty such conclusion can have.
And since that that SFO's decision may be used against Mr Beloy without completing a really full investigation.
A banking industry is very doog in creating artificial complexities for hiding its reality in public's eyes.
See more in Beloy's VIDEO documentary he created during investigating his case with the Barclays Bank,
- "FRAUDELISM: Banking Complexity":
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1aLJwC5_ros
We also have all reasons to believe that the following Beloy's documentary whistleblowing serial "FRAUDELISM: Unknown Barclays" was important factor for all related CEOs for starting their attempts to /K*LL/ him:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iPUdGj1S35w
Unlike the FCA's case about relatively innocent attempts of Jes Staley to reveal anonymous whistleblower, for which he ultimately paid 1.1 million in fines, Sergiy Beloy acted openly, under his real name.
So, today we publish our open message to the CFO!
It would be interesting to it that we still have no response to our recent 5 URGENT letters to the British regulator FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) for related topics: Re. FCA Query - 205510706 [ ref:_00Db0K8yP._5000X1YIMUW:ref ] of September, to which the FCA has NOT responded at all up to now!!! And which we ultimately published at our blog:
http://bgate2018.blogspot.com/2018/10/to-fcaf.html
As we found out last weekends from our Barclays' insiders, Barclays' CEOs for years DECIEVE its staff, shareholders, partners, and even members of their families about Beloy's case. And we were SHOCKED with details.
Starting with, they argue existence of ANY(!) DEBT to its customer Sergiy Beloy! (In this connection we would recall that in 2015 it took almost 5 months for their customer service just to accept in written at least existence of official Beloy's savings accounts in the Barclays bank). Further CEOs' presentation of these events is based on their intentionally FALSE statement that in 2016 they have paid their debt to Mr Beloy already. We must refute that LIE:
First, that wasn't about reimbursing their debt to Sergiy! It was about their first (and as appeared later, the only) tiny symbolic payment towards their future Settlement. And it took for them the whole 16 YEARS. And Sergiy did NOT obtain that money at all!!!
Because the CEOs did it IMPOSSIBLE for him!
They sent to Sergiy their banking CHEQUE, which Sergiy could not cash!
Banks in his country stopped processing any checks a year before! And to cash it in Europe or anywhere in the world requires openning a local banking account, which is impossible for non-residents! And the Barclays CEOs KNEW that: Sergiy told that them for a half of year before, and a half of year after that sending! However, among all other legally existing ways of sending money proposed them by Sergiy (transfer to his bank in his native country, or through any other international money transfer services, e.g., WesternUnion), they intentionally (FRAUDELENTLY) chosen the only one that was IMPOSSIBLE for Sergiy!
But much bigger degree of that FRAUD appeared in their using the fact of recieving that cheque by Beloy as evidence of their official paying all Barclays' debts to him. And we have all reasons to believe that was a main and the only purpose of that transaction!
Since then, the Barclays' CEOs makes a FALSE impression that they (1) paid their debt, and (2) paid it in full. Neither of these statements is true.
The FACT is the Barclays' DEBT to Sergiy Beloy EXISTS!
During last 18 years, there is an official obligation of the Barclays Bank to its customer Sergiy Beloy, at least related to his original savings accounts in that bank.And in 2016 the Barclays' CEOs attempted to FALSIFY that fact. By the way, with the help of their FRAUDELENT official payment paper! While 100% true FACT is that since 2000, Sergiy Beloy has NOT recieved from the Barclays Bank a single penny!!!
ALL THEIR OTHER RELATED DEBTS TO Mr Beloy ARE SIMPLY IGNORED!
Another ambarrassing act of the CEOs is speaking about amount of money at Beloy's savings accounts in an arrogant manner, like, ...
the sum is too small.
First, such digits are quite relative. They may be not very impressive in the rich U.K., but in his native poor country he could live for it couple years. Anyway, the sum on Beloy's accounts in Barclays bank would be sufficient enough for paying ALL(!) HIS DEBTS the year when his apartment was set to be confiscated!
Second, a fact of existence of any debt, - as well as stealing!, - does not depend on a sum!
It either exists, or not!
And in our case the answer is positive!
Moreover, the key feature of the #Bgate is existence of INFINITE DEBT, the most important details about which we did not supplied to SFO!!! And fact of its INFINITY makes our already EXCEPTIONAL case ABSOLUTELY UNPRECEDENTED!!!
Why we did not touch this topic in our conversation with SFO? We had certain reasons to doubt SFO' objectivity at that time. And as following events showed, it was a right decision.
Our guess was:
Nobody would really investigate legality of Beloy's INFINITY Debt invention. Once completely full in its integrity information on INFINITE Debt appear at SFO's desk, it will be officially announced not legal, no matter what degree of uncertainty such conclusion can have.
And since that that SFO's decision may be used against Mr Beloy without completing a really full investigation.
A banking industry is very doog in creating artificial complexities for hiding its reality in public's eyes.
See more in Beloy's VIDEO documentary he created during investigating his case with the Barclays Bank,
- "FRAUDELISM: Banking Complexity":
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=1aLJwC5_ros
We also have all reasons to believe that the following Beloy's documentary whistleblowing serial "FRAUDELISM: Unknown Barclays" was important factor for all related CEOs for starting their attempts to /K*LL/ him:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iPUdGj1S35w
Unlike the FCA's case about relatively innocent attempts of Jes Staley to reveal anonymous whistleblower, for which he ultimately paid 1.1 million in fines, Sergiy Beloy acted openly, under his real name.
So, today we publish our open message to the CFO!
It would be interesting to it that we still have no response to our recent 5 URGENT letters to the British regulator FCA (Financial Conduct Authority) for related topics: Re. FCA Query - 205510706 [ ref:_00Db0K8yP._5000X1YIMUW:ref ] of September, to which the FCA has NOT responded at all up to now!!! And which we ultimately published at our blog:
http://bgate2018.blogspot.com/2018/10/to-fcaf.html
Today we demand from the Barclays' Chairman John McFarlane officially accept in an urgent press release that that was a FALSIFIED version of this story, and provide the public with links to our websites, starting from our
and Beloy's personal blog:
Комментарии
Отправить комментарий