Beloy's CHARITY vs. Rothschilds and Rockefellers' one
Cite: "Two rules that all mega-plutocrats must obey if they want to be remembered in a century’s time. One: ensure your children feel a duty to preserve the family fortune. And, two, paradoxical as it may sound: give as much money as you can to universities, galleries and hospitals". S. Beloy did not intend to spend all the sum of the debt to himself. Just on the contrary, since 2012 he declared that he was going to spend it mostly for CHARITY! Obviously, with deduction of his initial savings accounts and compensation for the related expenses he had to spent during last 18 years for the "job" of obtaining his money back. Considering the unprecedently huge scale of the full Barclays' debt to him, his personal share would be just a tiny fraction of it, less than 0.0000001% anyway. Compare that with John D. Rockefeller's habit of charitable giving, which people call amazingly generous: "We don’t understand the kind of Christianity that he adhered to”...